Midjourney
来自 Midjourney
Still the reference for art-directed still images. The workflow is less convenient than a normal app, and it is a paid product.
- 适合
- Stills where taste matters more than a simple marketing template.
- 价格提示
- Paid plans. Do not count on a lasting free tier.
Midjourney is the pick for images because art direction is the product. It is the wrong tool if you need editable layers, brand-system control, or a free experiment.
适合之处
- The look is still the one other models get compared with.
- Good when a person is steering style, not just typing a caption.
不适合之处
- Paid, and the interface is its own habit.
- Text inside images is not its strength.
标签: 图像 · 设计
也归入 图像
笔记更新于 2026年10月15日
这条笔记还没有中文（简体）版本，因此你正在阅读英文。
图像中的其他工具
- Adobe Firefly — The practical pick when you already pay Adobe and you want the company's training-data claim in writing. Pure art direction still trails Midjourney and Flux.
- Flux — The right pick for teams who want image generation in their own product or on their own machines. The wrong pick if you want a polished consumer app.
- Gemini — Worth opening when the work already lives in Google, or when you want image generation in the same chat. Not the first pick for code or a long edit.
- Ideogram — The image model to try first when the picture must contain readable text: posters, thumbnails, simple layouts.